AP STATE SEPARATION - PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUES
AP State Separation - Property Rights Issues
Andhra Pradesh got
separated into two states on 2nd June, 2014. Even after one
year of the separation, the issues
related to assets and its allocation etc is not clear and ambiguous. A sort of unpleasant situation is being developed and things are
not very clear for both states. GOI who
was instrumental in the separation of the state, has to get into the depth of
the state reorganization bill and ensure that equal justice is done .
As it was clearly
stated in reorganization bill, Hyderabad will be the integral part of Telangana
& AP have to look for suitable place for capital and GOI will suitably
support AP in capital building exercise. AP is given the opportunity of having
their capital in Hyderabad for a period of 10 years & GHMC jurisdiction is
declared as common capital area.
Andhra
Pradesh was established as a new state
in the year 1956 by combining Hyderabad state with another part separated from
Madras state. It's a very unique state in Indian union, having regional
reservations in education, employment & even political commitments, other
than mulki rules.
AP over 55 years of
existence under visionary Chief Ministers from both regions progressed in all
fronts with inclusive development and became a leading state in the country. Hyderabad
being a metropolitan city with potential to grow to international standards
like Delhi/Mumbai/Chennai/Bangalore was given thrust by the rulers. The
projects such as Cyberabad, ISB, New
International Airport, ORR etc coupled with industrial corridors established
Hyderabad on international map and got recognition as IT capital of India along
with Bangalore. It is not an
exaggeration to say that Telugus got their due recognition only after NTR
becoming CM & till then Telugus are called Madrasi in Delhi. It's
unfortunate that the state conceived and
developed after Independence was bifurcated and exposed to vulnerable
situations for no fault of its people. I am sure Telugus being hard working
& progressive thinking, will take these challenges as opportunities and
both the states will compete with other on development and ensure that both
will have their presence felt internationally for positive reasons.
Coming back to
the issue of bifurcation, it is the responsibility of GOI as a responsible
facilitator of the process to ensure that the man power, resources,
intellectual property rights, copy rights, liabilities, commitments etc are allocated
on sound logic and rationale. As the
bifurcation was done in hurry & jet speed, though the reorganization bill
was in place, while putting into action so many issues are being cropped up. Probably
had one corporation/ department was taken as case study & detailed exercise
was done using simulation & participatory
techniques the detailed issues & alternatives would have come out.
This was missing in the document.
The ownership on
assets in Hyderabad is being a big issue and before it takes an ugly turn,
needs to be addressed within a logical frame work. Let us take the case of APSRTC, State owned
public transport corporation as a case study. It has assets all over the state
like regional centres in Warangal, Karimnagar, Vijayawada, Tirupathi etc and
head quarters at Hyderabad.
RTC created
infrastructure at various places to cater to the needs of people including the
bus stands etc in Hyderabad. Huge
infrastructure/Corporate office is
created to facilitate the requirements of corporation to handle state level
operations which include Finance, Management, corporate governance, policy,
trainings etc. Logically speaking except the HQ infrastructure, other assets
can be transferred to the respective states based on geographical locations.
Head office infrastructure, intellectual property rights etc which are
indivisible, as they are in Hyderabad has to be given to Telangana, after mutually
accepted valuation and giving credit to AP on the ratio already decided based
on population index. The same logic shall be applied to all corporations/
public sector enterprises of similar nature.
In case of
Singareni Collieries, the entire mines are located in Telangana and they are the
properties of Telangana. But to harvest
coal from mines the combined state invested huge funds and created the
corporation and to that extent both states have rights over corporation and
100% rights to Telangana on mines. Now both can own the corporation jointly and
corporation can pay royalty to Telangana. Otherwise they can go for valuation
& AP shall be compensated. Similar logic shall be extended to the corporations
of similar nature.
Physical assets
we can quantify, qualify & have valuations. Can we play with our pool of
talent and institutions of higher learning? Let us have big heart and decide on
such institutions in the larger interest of society and Telugus in particular.
Recent provocations from both sides on issues
related to secretariat (GHMC demanding property tax from AP), MCRHRD and about
140 schedule institutions located in Hyderabad are to be addressed amicably.
Logic is same, only wisdom has to prevail. Both sides has to show genuine love
and affection towards each other. Never forget the fact that we are brothers
and one family, divided as a state but united as Telugus.
Requesting GOI to
play unbiased big brother role and see that it is win-win situation for both
states. Please honor the commitments made in August house- Parliament , related to AP bifurcation and
ensure that people's confidence on democracy is kept very high.
B G R
grbonthu@gmail.com & 9866889246
Comments